{"id":83528,"date":"2020-07-02T12:00:49","date_gmt":"2020-07-02T10:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/zentor.de\/?p=83528"},"modified":"2025-07-08T19:41:56","modified_gmt":"2025-07-08T17:41:56","slug":"how-happy-are-you-empirically-speaking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zentor.de\/en\/how-happy-are-you-empirically-speaking\/","title":{"rendered":"How happy are you – empirically speaking?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The zentor Purpose Score was validated in a scientific study of the TU Munich as a reliable metric for happiness and fulfilment<\/h4>\n\n

Quite a while ago we asked ourselves ‘Can one measure fulfillment <\/span><\/a>‘ and realized that with the exception of our zentor Purpose Score<\/span><\/a> there are only a few scientifically based metrics and questionnaires which capture the parameters of a fulfilled life. And those that do exist either give no indication of what might be missing for a fulfilled life or are quite long and complex to fill in.<\/p>\n\n

This is not surprising after all, since fulfillment and especially purpose (or deeper meaning) as one of the main factors are very abstract and individually different concepts that are difficult to put into one ’empirical drawer’. Our approach at zentor, however, is to contribute as a mentor to a fulfilled life in an empirical way – i.e. with the help of data and facts. Therefore, we developed some time ago our zentor Purpose Score <\/a>on the basis of various theoretical approaches <\/a>with the aim of providing valid insights with very few questions, which allow for evidence-based individual recommendations. The questionnaire not only captures the current sentiment and the development over time, but also allows to draw conclusions about the causes of our emotional state (derived from happiness research) and provides clues for more fulfilment in life.<\/p>\n\n

\n
Go to zentor’s Purpose Score<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Logo of the Technical University TU Munich<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n

But all theory is gray, because until now we were convinced that our Purpose Score works well, but we lacked the empirical evidence, which we now – drumroll please<\/em>– provide in the form of a scientific study in cooperation with the Technical University of Munich.<\/strong> In a study with 332 participants, the zentor Purpose Score (ZPS) was evaluated on the basis of scientific quality criteria as an independent construct and was compared with other key concepts and metrics. The study concludes with the following summary: <\/p>\n\n

‘In summary, the zentor Purpose Score can be recommended as a valid happiness measure.’ <\/strong><\/p>(Dietrich, D. 2020, TU M\u00fcnchen)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n

Construct validity <\/h5>\n\n

For the internal validation of the ZPS as an independent construct for assessing happiness and fulfillment, different structural models were considered as to how the empirical results of the questionnaire can best be summarized into an overall construct by multiplicatively linking individual items – in sum with acceptable indices of model fit. In addition, the internal consistency and reliability of the ZPS were assessed as moderate to good on the basis of various criteria; the same applies to the reliability of the retest, which was assessed on the basis of a follow-up survey conducted a few weeks later.<\/p>\n\n

\"\"
Structural models for the evaluation of the ZPS considered in the study (Dietrich, D. 2020)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Table 2 shows that both the four-factor model (M1) and the simple three-factor model (M3) yield almost equally good model-fit quality criteria and are suitable for the use of an overall purpose score. In the four-factor model, in addition to the three main sources for a fulfilled life (purpose, engagement, appreciation), an overlap metric of the three factors is also included – i.e. the extent to which engagement and appreciation each are perceived as purposeful. In our opinion, this is an important factor, given that if we draw our purpose, our commitment and our appreciation out of different tasks and areas of life, these become more difficult to integrate into everyday life – with its usual time constraints. The higher the overlap, the easier a fulfilled life should be feasible, so we decided to include the overlap factor in the ZPS. <\/p>\n\n

\"\"
Model-fit quality criteria of the considered structural models (Dietrich, D. 2020)For all fit indices (\u03c7<\/em>2 \/ df to BIC) applies: Smaller is better, with the exception of CFI <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

One recommendation of the study was to include two questions on sentiment – which had already been part of the questionnaire, but not the calculation – as a further factor in the ZPS in order to add the hedonistic aspect of a happy, fulfilled life to the more eudaimonic factors (purpose, engagement, appreciation). Of course we gladly accepted this recommendation, so that the zentor purpose score now consists of five factors<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n